California Court of Appeals Finds Arbitration Agreement Procedurally and Substantively Unconscionable

On 11/20/24, the California Court of Appeals issued a decision in Jenkins v. Dermatology Mgmt., LLC, in which it held that an arbitration agreement was procedurally and substantively unconscionable where the employer representative signed the agreement before the employee was ever provided the agreement (thus a "take it or leave it" condition of employment, and the agreement required the employee but not her employer to arbitrate claims, the agreement shortened the limitations period to one (1) year, the agreement imposed unreasonable restrictions on discovery, and the agreement required the parties to equally share the arbitrator's fees and costs:

https://www4.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B333759.PDF

Popular posts from this blog

National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) DEI Program Issues "Inclusive Writing Guide"

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)'s San Francisco District Appoints U.C. San Diego Alumni As Director