California Court of Appeals Finds $493k Award of Attorneys Fees Under FEHA was Not in Error
On 1/8/25, the California Court of Appeal issued a ruling finding that an employee was a "prevailing party" and affirming the fee award against her supervisor, where the parties settled. The trial court found her lawsuit was time-barred but the Supreme Court later reversed and found the limitations period began when the employee knew or should have known of the adverse promotion decision (21 Cal. 5th 918). Following remand, the California Court of Appeals ordered costs on appeal for the employee. In the trial court, the employee asked for $526,476 in attorneys' fees under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), and the trial court awarded $493,577. A notice of appeal was filed with respect to the attorneys' fees award, but the parties settled before trial. The Court of Appeals noted that considerable deference was owed to the trial court and affirmed the award of attorneys' fees, although it found the trial court had erred by awarding fees before trial, though the error was harmless in light of the settlement. Finally, the Court found that the trial court used a reasonable multiplier and found that the size of the award was not in error: