Cal. Court of Appeals Upholds Trial Court Finding that Unconscionable Provision of Arbitration Agreement Could not be Severed

On 2/24/25, in Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc., the California Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming a trial court's ruling not to sever unconscionable provisions of an arbitration agreement in a case involving claims brought under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The challenged provisions included those: describing which claims were subject to and excluded from arbitration; imposing a shortened filing period for certain claims; limiting discovery available in arbitration; and allowing the employer to recover attorneys' fees in a manner contrary to FEHA. The Court found that severing the unconscionable provisions would not further the interests of justice under Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc. 

https://www4.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B309408A.PDF

Popular posts from this blog

National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) DEI Program Issues "Inclusive Writing Guide"

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)'s San Francisco District Appoints U.C. San Diego Alumni As Director