California Court of Appeals Finds Arbitration Agreement Which Incorporates JAMS Rules on Third Party Discovery was Not Substantively Unconscionable

On 2/4/2025, in Vo v. Technology Credit Union, the California Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's ruling denying a motion to compel arbitration and found that the arbitration agreement was not substantively unconscionable where the agreement incorporated JAMS Rules, including JAMS Rule 17 which grants the arbitrator the ability to expand discovery and allow third party discovery rights:

https://www4.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/H051619.PDF

Popular posts from this blog

National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) DEI Program Issues "Inclusive Writing Guide"

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)'s San Francisco District Appoints U.C. San Diego Alumni As Director